[Shorewall-users] Problematic configuration....
Gavin Thomas Nicol
gtn at rbii.com
Tue Jan 20 20:36:58 PST 2004
On Tuesday 20 January 2004 06:36 pm, Tom Eastep wrote:
> I think you'll be happier with one-to-one nat on the "Visible box".
> Otherwise, getting the "Visible box" to communicate with the rest of the
> local network is a real headache (unless you add another interface to the
A licensing application running on the "Visible" box requires the external and
machine IP's to match (apparently). In the nat file, can I do something like
68.x.x.3 eth1 68.x.x.3 no no
68.x.x.26 eth1:0 68.x.x.26 no no
in order to have the packets coming in from eth1 and eth1:0 forwarded to the
"Visible" box (which in turn with have eth0 and eth0:0 bound to the
Sorry if these are newbie questions...
More information about the Shorewall-users